I've been wrestling all night with the conservative claim that it's not homosexuality that they object to per se, but rather "homosexual practices."
It's pretty hard to nail them down and get them to specify exactly what "homosexual practices" are problematic, but I think it's safe to assume that it's specific sexual acts that they are talking about.
The thing is, there's nothing that homosexuals do that at least some heterosexuals don't also do, and to the best of my knowledge no married candidate for ministry has ever been asked if he or she participates in oral or anal sex with his or her spouse.
To my ears, then, the argument sounds something like this: "God hates oral and anal sex, they're abominations, unless you go to a church and hire a minister to say some magic words and fill out a form, then they're pretty much ok."
Now I know that there is more to marriage than magic words and a form, but those are the only parts of marriage that homosexuals can't participate in, so they must be the mechanisms through which sinful things become not sinful.
They never told me in seminary that ministers have the power to makes sins not be sins, but I do remember reading about indulgences, and I got the impression that we were supposed to be against them.

I would suggest that they would also object to, oh say, kissing and holding hands as well. And those two things do not require magic words or pieces of paper. Maybe they're mad because homosexuals have to "practice" and the rest of the world gets it right the first time. Sorry, that's just the way my brain is working today.
Posted by: Muphinsmom | March 05, 2008 at 02:04 PM
Meghan, I just wanted to commend you for making the comments you did on Jim Berkeley's blog. Getting involved with that blog has been a consistently frustrating and painful experience for me in the past, so I tend to write comments and then delete them because I know the kind of treatment I can expect from his "loving discipline" and that of his allies. But I thought you made good points, which were avoided of course, that could have added to the conversation - if most of the commenters were interested in a conversation that is. So, anyway, thanks for making the effort. Maybe someday some kind of connection will be made.
Posted by: Doug | March 09, 2008 at 04:33 AM
Marriage is an indulgence?
Yikes.
Posted by: Heather W. Reichgott | March 11, 2008 at 09:18 PM
Hi Meghan,
I've tagged you for a Presbyterian blogging meme. For details look here if you want to play.
xo
Posted by: Heather W. Reichgott | March 22, 2008 at 07:56 PM